Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) vs University of California Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 14.9 percentage points (98.4% vs 83.5%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.
| Metric | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) | University of California Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 86/100 (A)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 98.4%* | 83.5% |
| Total Assets | $122.0B | $82.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.0B | $98.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $2.0B* | $16.2B |
| Participants | 665,000 | 305,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2% | 7.2% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Wisconsin | University of California |
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 14.9 percentage points (98.4% vs 83.5%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.