Skip to main content
PensionRisk

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) vs Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) (C) and Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 67% and 64% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 58/100 (C) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 3.2 percentage points (67.3% vs 64.1%). California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) covers 2,050,000 participants.

MetricCalifornia Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS)Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
58/100 (C)*56/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
67.3%*64.1%
Total Assets$473.0B$21.0B
Total Liabilities$703.0B$32.8B*
Unfunded Liability$230.0B$11.8B*
Participants2,050,000430,000
1-Year Investment Return5.8%*5.5%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatehigh
SponsorState of CaliforniaUnited Association (UA)

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 58/100 (C) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 3.2 percentage points (67.3% vs 64.1%). California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) covers 2,050,000 participants.

Explore More