Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) (C) and New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 65% and 48% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 61/100 (C) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 16.7 percentage points (64.8% vs 48.1%). Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) covers 625,000 participants.

MetricColorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
61/100 (C)*51/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.8%*48.1%
Total Assets$58.0B$28.5B
Total Liabilities$89.5B$59.3B*
Unfunded Liability$31.5B$30.8B*
Participants625,000268,000
1-Year Investment Return5.5%*4.9%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighhigh
SponsorState of ColoradoState of New Jersey

Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 61/100 (C) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 16.7 percentage points (64.8% vs 48.1%). Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) covers 625,000 participants.

Explore More