Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs Washington State Department of Retirement Systems
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 23.0 percentage points (87.8% vs 64.8%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.
| Metric | Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) | Washington State Department of Retirement Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 61/100 (C) | 82/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 64.8% | 87.8%* |
| Total Assets | $58.0B | $108.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $89.5B* | $123.0B |
| Unfunded Liability | $31.5B | $15.0B* |
| Participants | 625,000 | 528,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.5% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | low |
| Sponsor | State of Colorado | State of Washington |
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 23.0 percentage points (87.8% vs 64.8%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.