Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs Washington State Department of Retirement Systems

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and Washington State Department of Retirement Systems are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) grades C while Washington State Department of Retirement Systems grades A. Funding ratios: 65% vs 88%.

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 23.0 percentage points (87.8% vs 64.8%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.

MetricColorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)Washington State Department of Retirement Systems
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
61/100 (C)82/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.8%87.8%*
Total Assets$58.0B$108.0B
Total Liabilities$89.5B*$123.0B
Unfunded Liability$31.5B$15.0B*
Participants625,000528,000
1-Year Investment Return5.5%6.7%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorState of ColoradoState of Washington

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 23.0 percentage points (87.8% vs 64.8%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.

Explore More