Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan vs Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan and Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan grades A while Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan grades B. Funding ratios: 105% vs 79%.

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 26.5 percentage points (105.3% vs 78.8%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

MetricFord Motor Company Retirement PlanLockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*70/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.3%*78.8%
Total Assets$19.3B$17.4B
Total Liabilities$18.3B*$22.1B
Unfunded Liability$0*$4.7B
Participants141,94884,564
1-Year Investment Return7.5%*7.1%
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorFord Motor CompanyLockheed Martin

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 26.5 percentage points (105.3% vs 78.8%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons