Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan vs Northrop Grumman Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan (A) and Northrop Grumman Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 105% and 106% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Northrop Grumman Pension Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 0.9 percentage points (105.3% vs 106.2%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

MetricFord Motor Company Retirement PlanNorthrop Grumman Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)100/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.3%106.2%*
Total Assets$19.3B$18.7B
Total Liabilities$18.3B$17.6B*
Unfunded Liability$0$0
Participants141,948106,531
1-Year Investment Return7.5%*7.3%
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorFord Motor CompanyNorthrop Grumman

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Northrop Grumman Pension Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 0.9 percentage points (105.3% vs 106.2%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons