IBM Personal Pension Plan vs General Electric Pension Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
IBM Personal Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 13.9 percentage points (90.1% vs 76.2%). IBM Personal Pension Plan covers 382,000 participants.
| Metric | IBM Personal Pension Plan | General Electric Pension Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 83/100 (A)* | 72/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 90.1%* | 76.2% |
| Total Assets | $56.0B | $38.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $62.2B | $50.5B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $6.2B* | $12.0B |
| Participants | 382,000 | 318,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.6%* | 6.8% |
| Plan Type | corporate | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | IBM Corporation | GE Aerospace (formerly General Electric) |
IBM Personal Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 13.9 percentage points (90.1% vs 76.2%). IBM Personal Pension Plan covers 382,000 participants.