Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) vs Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 17.1 percentage points (81.2% vs 64.1%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) | Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 56/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.2%* | 64.1% |
| Total Assets | $51.2B | $21.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $63.1B | $32.8B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $11.9B | $11.8B* |
| Participants | 438,000 | 430,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8%* | 5.5% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | high |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | United Association (UA) |
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 17.1 percentage points (81.2% vs 64.1%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.