Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund vs International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund and International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund grades A while International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust grades B. Funding ratios: 99% vs 71%.

Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 99/100 (A) compared to International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 27.1 percentage points (98.6% vs 71.4%). Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund covers 44,923 participants.

MetricLaborers National (Industrial) Pension FundInternational Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
99/100 (A)*79/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
98.6%*71.4%
Total Assets$4.9B$139.8M
Total Liabilities$5.0B$195.7M*
Unfunded Liability$71.8M$55.9M*
Participants44,923729
1-Year Investment Return5.3%5.5%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorLIUNABoilermakers Union

Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 99/100 (A) compared to International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 27.1 percentage points (98.6% vs 71.4%). Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund covers 44,923 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons