Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund vs National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund and National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund grades A while National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) grades A. Funding ratios: 105% vs 74%.

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 30.9 percentage points (105.1% vs 74.3%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

MetricOperating Engineers Local 324 Pension FundNational Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*80/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.1%*74.3%
Total Assets$24.8B$1.5B
Total Liabilities$23.6B$2.0B*
Unfunded Liability$0*$523.2M
Participants230,03918,619
1-Year Investment Return5.7%*5.2%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorIUOE Local 324IBEW & NECA

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 30.9 percentage points (105.1% vs 74.3%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons