Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) vs NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 3.1 percentage points (77.3% vs 74.2%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.
| Metric | Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) | NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 77.3%* | 74.2% |
| Total Assets | $84.0B | $92.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $108.7B* | $124.0B |
| Unfunded Liability | $24.7B* | $32.0B |
| Participants | 375,000 | 225,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.7%* | 5.4% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Oregon | New York City |
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 3.1 percentage points (77.3% vs 74.2%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.