Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 4.0 percentage points (64.1% vs 60.1%). Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund covers 430,000 participants.
| Metric | Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund | Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 56/100 (C)* | 54/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 64.1%* | 60.1% |
| Total Assets | $21.0B | $29.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $32.8B* | $48.3B |
| Unfunded Liability | $11.8B* | $19.3B |
| Participants | 430,000 | 322,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.5%* | 5.3% |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | high |
| Sponsor | United Association (UA) | State of Mississippi |
Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 4.0 percentage points (64.1% vs 60.1%). Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund covers 430,000 participants.