Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund (C) and New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 64% and 50% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 61/100 (C) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 13.8 percentage points (50.3% vs 64.1%). New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund covers 33,330 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundNew York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)61/100 (C)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%*50.3%
Total Assets$21.0B$1.8B
Total Liabilities$32.8B$3.7B*
Unfunded Liability$11.8B$1.8B*
Participants430,00033,330
1-Year Investment Return5.5%*4.3%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighhigh
SponsorUnited Association (UA)NY Teamsters Conference

New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 61/100 (C) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 13.8 percentage points (50.3% vs 64.1%). New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund covers 33,330 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons