Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund (C) and NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 64% and 77% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 12.7 percentage points (76.8% vs 64.1%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundNYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)71/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%76.8%*
Total Assets$21.0B$77.2B
Total Liabilities$32.8B*$100.5B
Unfunded Liability$11.8B*$23.3B
Participants430,000370,000
1-Year Investment Return5.5%5.6%*
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighmoderate
SponsorUnited Association (UA)New York City

NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 12.7 percentage points (76.8% vs 64.1%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.

Explore More