Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) vs Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) (A) and Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 86% and 72% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 13.9 percentage points (86.2% vs 72.3%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.
| Metric | Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) | Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 81/100 (A)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 86.2%* | 72.3% |
| Total Assets | $39.5B | $24.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $45.8B | $34.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $6.3B* | $9.5B |
| Participants | 385,000 | 328,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.6%* | 5.9% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | Texas Counties | State of Kansas |
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 13.9 percentage points (86.2% vs 72.3%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.