University of California Retirement Plan vs NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
University of California Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 9.3 percentage points (83.5% vs 74.2%). University of California Retirement Plan covers 305,000 participants.
| Metric | University of California Retirement Plan | NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 78/100 (B)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 83.5%* | 74.2% |
| Total Assets | $82.0B | $92.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $98.2B* | $124.0B |
| Unfunded Liability | $16.2B* | $32.0B |
| Participants | 305,000 | 225,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2%* | 5.4% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | University of California | New York City |
University of California Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 9.3 percentage points (83.5% vs 74.2%). University of California Retirement Plan covers 305,000 participants.