Skip to main content
PensionRisk

UPS Retirement Plan vs Deere & Company Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

UPS Retirement Plan (A) and Deere & Company Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 91% and 124% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Deere & Company Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to UPS Retirement Plan at 95/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 33.3 percentage points (124.0% vs 90.7%). Deere & Company Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

MetricUPS Retirement PlanDeere & Company Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
95/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
90.7%124.0%*
Total Assets$9.7B$21.1B
Total Liabilities$10.7B*$17.0B
Unfunded Liability$993.0M$0*
Participants243,93283,076
1-Year Investment Return6.7%7.4%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorUnited Parcel ServiceJohn Deere

Deere & Company Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to UPS Retirement Plan at 95/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 33.3 percentage points (124.0% vs 90.7%). Deere & Company Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons