Skip to main content
PensionRisk

UPS Retirement Plan vs Northrop Grumman Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

UPS Retirement Plan (A) and Northrop Grumman Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 91% and 106% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to UPS Retirement Plan at 95/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.5 percentage points (106.2% vs 90.7%). Northrop Grumman Pension Plan covers 106,531 participants.

MetricUPS Retirement PlanNorthrop Grumman Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
95/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
90.7%106.2%*
Total Assets$9.7B$18.7B
Total Liabilities$10.7B*$17.6B
Unfunded Liability$993.0M$0*
Participants243,932106,531
1-Year Investment Return6.7%7.3%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorUnited Parcel ServiceNorthrop Grumman

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to UPS Retirement Plan at 95/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.5 percentage points (106.2% vs 90.7%). Northrop Grumman Pension Plan covers 106,531 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons