Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems vs AT&T Pension Benefit Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems (A) and AT&T Pension Benefit Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 88% and 94% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Washington State Department of Retirement Systems at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 5.9 percentage points (93.7% vs 87.8%). AT&T Pension Benefit Plan covers 286,355 participants.

MetricWashington State Department of Retirement SystemsAT&T Pension Benefit Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)97/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
87.8%93.7%*
Total Assets$108.0B$30.0B
Total Liabilities$123.0B$32.0B*
Unfunded Liability$15.0B$2.0B*
Participants528,000286,355
1-Year Investment Return6.7%6.9%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of WashingtonAT&T Inc.

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Washington State Department of Retirement Systems at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 5.9 percentage points (93.7% vs 87.8%). AT&T Pension Benefit Plan covers 286,355 participants.

Explore More