Washington State Department of Retirement Systems vs Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 15.5 percentage points (87.8% vs 72.3%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.
| Metric | Washington State Department of Retirement Systems | Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 82/100 (A)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 87.8%* | 72.3% |
| Total Assets | $108.0B | $24.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $123.0B | $34.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $15.0B | $9.5B* |
| Participants | 528,000 | 328,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.7%* | 5.9% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Washington | State of Kansas |
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 15.5 percentage points (87.8% vs 72.3%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.