Washington State Department of Retirement Systems vs Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) at 81/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 1.6 percentage points (87.8% vs 86.2%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.
| Metric | Washington State Department of Retirement Systems | Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 82/100 (A)* | 81/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 87.8%* | 86.2% |
| Total Assets | $108.0B | $39.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $123.0B | $45.8B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $15.0B | $6.3B* |
| Participants | 528,000 | 385,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.7%* | 6.6% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Washington | Texas Counties |
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) at 81/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 1.6 percentage points (87.8% vs 86.2%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.