Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) vs Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 33.6 percentage points (98.4% vs 64.8%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.
| Metric | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) | Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 86/100 (A)* | 61/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 98.4%* | 64.8% |
| Total Assets | $122.0B | $58.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.0B | $89.5B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $2.0B* | $31.5B |
| Participants | 665,000 | 625,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2%* | 5.5% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | high |
| Sponsor | State of Wisconsin | State of Colorado |
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 33.6 percentage points (98.4% vs 64.8%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.