Skip to main content
PensionRisk

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan vs Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan (A) and Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 105% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.6 percentage points (105.3% vs 93.7%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

MetricAT&T Pension Benefit PlanFord Motor Company Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
93.7%105.3%*
Total Assets$30.0B$19.3B
Total Liabilities$32.0B$18.3B*
Unfunded Liability$2.0B$0*
Participants286,355141,948
1-Year Investment Return6.9%7.5%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorAT&T Inc.Ford Motor Company

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.6 percentage points (105.3% vs 93.7%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons