Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan vs International Paper Company Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan (A) and International Paper Company Retirement Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 105% and 104% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to International Paper Company Retirement Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 1.3 percentage points (105.3% vs 104.0%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

MetricFord Motor Company Retirement PlanInternational Paper Company Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)100/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.3%*104.0%
Total Assets$19.3B$8.8B
Total Liabilities$18.3B$8.5B*
Unfunded Liability$0$0
Participants141,94883,689
1-Year Investment Return7.5%*7.0%
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorFord Motor CompanyInternational Paper

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to International Paper Company Retirement Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 1.3 percentage points (105.3% vs 104.0%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons