Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) vs NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.9 percentage points (72.3% vs 74.2%). Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) covers 328,000 participants.
| Metric | Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) | NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 68/100 (B) | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.3% | 74.2%* |
| Total Assets | $24.8B | $92.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $34.3B* | $124.0B |
| Unfunded Liability | $9.5B* | $32.0B |
| Participants | 328,000 | 225,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.9%* | 5.4% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Kansas | New York City |
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.9 percentage points (72.3% vs 74.2%). Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) covers 328,000 participants.