Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) vs Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) (C) and Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 60% and 60% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 0.3 percentage points (60.4% vs 60.1%). Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) covers 465,000 participants.

MetricMichigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS)Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)*54/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
60.4%*60.1%
Total Assets$54.0B$29.0B
Total Liabilities$89.4B$48.3B*
Unfunded Liability$35.4B$19.3B*
Participants465,000322,000
1-Year Investment Return5.3%5.3%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighhigh
SponsorState of MichiganState of Mississippi

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 0.3 percentage points (60.4% vs 60.1%). Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) covers 465,000 participants.

Explore More