Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund (C) and New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 64% and 48% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 16.0 percentage points (64.1% vs 48.1%). Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund covers 430,000 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundNew Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)*51/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%*48.1%
Total Assets$21.0B$28.5B
Total Liabilities$32.8B*$59.3B
Unfunded Liability$11.8B*$30.8B
Participants430,000268,000
1-Year Investment Return5.5%*4.9%
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighhigh
SponsorUnited Association (UA)State of New Jersey

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 16.0 percentage points (64.1% vs 48.1%). Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund covers 430,000 participants.

Explore More