Skip to main content
PensionRisk

South Carolina Retirement System vs UPS Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

South Carolina Retirement System and UPS Retirement Plan are meaningfully apart on the PensionRisk pension-health rubric: South Carolina Retirement System grades C while UPS Retirement Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 55% vs 91%.

UPS Retirement Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Reviewed by PensionRisk Editorial Team · Updated

Verdict

UPS Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 95/100 (A) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 35.6 percentage points (90.7% vs 55.1%). UPS Retirement Plan covers 243,932 participants.

MetricSouth Carolina Retirement SystemUPS Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
52/100 (C)95/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
55.1%90.7%*
Total Assets$35.5B$9.7B
Total Liabilities$64.4B$10.7B*
Unfunded Liability$28.9B$993.0M*
Participants575,000243,932
1-Year Investment Return5.2%6.7%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorState of South CarolinaUnited Parcel Service

UPS Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 95/100 (A) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 35.6 percentage points (90.7% vs 55.1%). UPS Retirement Plan covers 243,932 participants.

Explore More

South Carolina Retirement System full profile|UPS Retirement Plan full profile

Related Comparisons