Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) vs NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) (A) and NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 86% and 74% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 12.0 percentage points (86.2% vs 74.2%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.

MetricTexas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS)NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
81/100 (A)*68/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
86.2%*74.2%
Total Assets$39.5B$92.0B
Total Liabilities$45.8B*$124.0B
Unfunded Liability$6.3B*$32.0B
Participants385,000225,000
1-Year Investment Return6.6%*5.4%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorTexas CountiesNew York City

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 12.0 percentage points (86.2% vs 74.2%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.

Explore More