Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) vs NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 12.0 percentage points (86.2% vs 74.2%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.
| Metric | Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) | NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 81/100 (A)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 86.2%* | 74.2% |
| Total Assets | $39.5B | $92.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $45.8B* | $124.0B |
| Unfunded Liability | $6.3B* | $32.0B |
| Participants | 385,000 | 225,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.6%* | 5.4% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | Texas Counties | New York City |
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 12.0 percentage points (86.2% vs 74.2%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.