Skip to main content
PensionRisk

UPS Retirement Plan vs General Electric Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

UPS Retirement Plan (A) and General Electric Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 91% and 91% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

UPS Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 95/100 (A) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 95/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 0.2 percentage points (90.7% vs 91.0%). UPS Retirement Plan covers 243,932 participants.

MetricUPS Retirement PlanGeneral Electric Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
95/100 (A)95/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
90.7%91.0%*
Total Assets$9.7B$20.2B
Total Liabilities$10.7B*$22.2B
Unfunded Liability$993.0M*$2.0B
Participants243,932121,730
1-Year Investment Return6.7%6.8%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorUnited Parcel ServiceGE Aerospace (formerly General Electric)

UPS Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 95/100 (A) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 95/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 0.2 percentage points (90.7% vs 91.0%). UPS Retirement Plan covers 243,932 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons