Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Virginia Retirement System (VRS) vs Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Virginia Retirement System (VRS) (B) and Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 75% and 60% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Virginia Retirement System (VRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 14.7 percentage points (75.1% vs 60.4%). Virginia Retirement System (VRS) covers 740,000 participants.

MetricVirginia Retirement System (VRS)Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
70/100 (B)*56/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
75.1%*60.4%
Total Assets$87.0B$54.0B
Total Liabilities$115.8B$89.4B*
Unfunded Liability$28.8B*$35.4B
Participants740,000465,000
1-Year Investment Return6.0%*5.3%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatehigh
SponsorState of VirginiaState of Michigan

Virginia Retirement System (VRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 14.7 percentage points (75.1% vs 60.4%). Virginia Retirement System (VRS) covers 740,000 participants.

Explore More