Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems vs Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems and Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Washington State Department of Retirement Systems grades A while Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund grades C. Funding ratios: 88% vs 64%.

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 23.7 percentage points (87.8% vs 64.1%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.

MetricWashington State Department of Retirement SystemsPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)*56/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
87.8%*64.1%
Total Assets$108.0B$21.0B
Total Liabilities$123.0B$32.8B*
Unfunded Liability$15.0B$11.8B*
Participants528,000430,000
1-Year Investment Return6.7%*5.5%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorState of WashingtonUnited Association (UA)

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 23.7 percentage points (87.8% vs 64.1%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.

Explore More