Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund (C) and NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 64% and 74% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 10.1 percentage points (74.2% vs 64.1%). NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 225,000 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundNYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)68/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%74.2%*
Total Assets$21.0B$92.0B
Total Liabilities$32.8B*$124.0B
Unfunded Liability$11.8B*$32.0B
Participants430,000225,000
1-Year Investment Return5.5%*5.4%
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighmoderate
SponsorUnited Association (UA)New York City

NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 10.1 percentage points (74.2% vs 64.1%). NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 225,000 participants.

Explore More