Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) vs Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) (C) and Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 60% and 64% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 3.7 percentage points (60.4% vs 64.1%). Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) covers 465,000 participants.

MetricMichigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS)Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)56/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
60.4%64.1%*
Total Assets$54.0B$21.0B
Total Liabilities$89.4B$32.8B*
Unfunded Liability$35.4B$11.8B*
Participants465,000430,000
1-Year Investment Return5.3%5.5%*
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighhigh
SponsorState of MichiganUnited Association (UA)

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 3.7 percentage points (60.4% vs 64.1%). Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) covers 465,000 participants.

Explore More