Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Detroit General Retirement System vs General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Detroit General Retirement System (B) and General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 72% and 77% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Detroit General Retirement System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 65/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.3 percentage points (71.8% vs 77.1%). Detroit General Retirement System covers 20,000 participants.

MetricDetroit General Retirement SystemGeneral Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
71/100 (B)*65/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
71.8%77.1%*
Total Assets$2.0B$739.0M
Total Liabilities$2.8B$958.8M*
Unfunded Liability$780.0M$219.7M*
Participants20,00011,395
1-Year Investment Return4.9%7.2%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatemoderate
SponsorCity of DetroitGeneral Motors

Detroit General Retirement System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 65/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.3 percentage points (71.8% vs 77.1%). Detroit General Retirement System covers 20,000 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons